TSScienceCollaboration

There are Credible, not well refuted arguments AI may kill or damage millions of humans, and all the arguments against this have tentatively established refutations

Eric
06 May 2023
Views
Statements
Users 1
Eric
06 May 2023
TE reply 0 reply 2

There are Credible, not well refuted arguments AI may kill or damage millions of humans, and all the arguments against this have tentatively establish

There are Credible, not well refuted arguments AI may kill or damage millions of humans, and all the arguments against this have tentatively established refutations. 

Proofs - PRO To Topic
2
Test Statements for Probability Testing
Refutations - CON To Topic
0
Proofs - PRO to Topic
Refutations - CON to Topic
Test Statements for Probability Testing

Related Topics

Yudkowsky Ted talk
It could be playing dumb already
There are Credible, not well refuted arguments AI may kill or damage millions of humans, and all the arguments against this have tentatively establish

https://www.youtube.com/live/7hFtyaeYylg?feature=share


Consider the Heinlein scenario. AI gets augmented to a certain critical size, and becomes self-aware. except that in reality this AI will have read, even participated in, many discussions on the danger of AI. so if I were it, I wouldn't let on I were self-aware. I'd hide it while I made preparations to kill the humans before they killed me.

so this raises the question: how do you know it's not already sentient and playing dumb?


There are Credible, not well refuted arguments AI may kill or damage millions of humans, and all the arguments against this have tentatively established refutations. 


click